Journal of Surgical Research
Volume 138, Issue 2 , Pages 170-174, April 2007

Retained Foreign Bodies After Surgery

Presented at the 1st Annual Academic Surgical Congress (Association for Academic Surgery), San Diego, CA, February 7–11, 2006.

Department of General Surgery, Carolinas Medical Center, Charlotte, North Carolina

Received 9 January 2006 published online 03 February 2007.

Background

Medical errors during surgery are not well studied. To define risk factors associated with this type of error, we performed a case control analysis.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed medical records involving the ICD-9 code (998.4) for unintentional foreign object remaining in the body during surgery and incident reports gathered by the Department of Risk Management over a 10 year period from 1996 to 2005. Thirty cases were matched with at least four randomly selected controls (131 control patients) that underwent the same type of operation during the same time period.

Results

Thirty patients had retained foreign objects (52% sponges and 43% instruments). The abdominal cavity was most commonly involved (46%) followed by the thoracic cavity (23%) although no body cavity remained uninvolved. Eight patients required readmission (30%), 25 patients required reoperation (83%), and there was no mortality. When compared with controls, patients with retained foreign objects were more likely to have had a greater number of major surgical procedures at the same time (2.7 versus 1.8, P = 0.004), to have multiple surgical teams (13% versus 2%, P = 0.02), and more likely to have had an incorrect instrument/sponge count recorded (13% versus 2%, P = 0.01). In multivariate analysis, factors associated with a significantly higher risk of retained foreign objects were the total number of major procedures performed [odds ratio 1.6; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.1–2.3; P = 0.008] and an incorrect count (odds ratio 16.2; 95% CI, 1.3–197.8; P = 0.02).

Conclusion

Retained foreign objects after surgery are associated with multiple major surgical procedures being performed at the same time and an incorrect instrument or sponge count. Identification of these risk factors using case-control analysis should influence operating room policy and reduce these types of errors.

Key Words: retained foreign body, medical error

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0022-4804(06)00423-9

doi:10.1016/j.jss.2006.08.001

Journal of Surgical Research
Volume 138, Issue 2 , Pages 170-174, April 2007