« Previous
Next »
Journal of Surgical Research
Volume 140, Issue 1
, Pages 6-11
, 1 June 2007
Comparative Evaluation of Adhesion Formation, Strength of Ingrowth, and Textile Properties of Prosthetic Meshes After Long-Term Intra-Abdominal Implantation in a Rabbit
References
- . Comparison of repair techniques for major incisional hernias. Am J Surg. 2003;185:61
- A comparison of suture repair with mesh repair for incisional hernia. N Engl J Med. 2000;343:392
- Long-term follow-up of a randomized controlled trial of suture versus mesh repair of incisional hernia. Ann Surg. 2004;240:575
- . Laparoscopic ventral hernia repair reduces wound complications. Am Surg. 2001;67:896
- Laparoscopic repair of ventral hernias: Nine years’ experience with 850 consecutive hernias. Ann Surg. 2003;238:391
- Laparoscopic treatment versus open surgery in the solution of major incisional and abdominal wall hernias with mesh. Surg Endosc. 1999;13:250
- . Laparoscopic intraperitoneal polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) prosthetic patch repair of ventral hernia (Prospective comparison to open prefascial polypropylene mesh repair). Surg Endosc. 2000;14:326
- Comparison of laparoscopic and open ventral herniorrhaphy. Am Surg. 1999;65:827
- . Laparoscopic and open incisional hernia repair: A comparison study. Surgery. 1998;124:816
- Laparoscopic ventral hernia repair in obese patients: A new standard of care. Arch Surg. 2006;141:57
- Long-term complications associated with prosthetic repair of incisional hernias. Arch Surg. 1998;133:378
- . Fecal fistula: A late complication of Marlex mesh repair. Dis Colon Rectum. 1981;24:543
- Assessment of adhesion formation to intra-abdominal polypropylene mesh and polytetrafluoroethylene mesh. J Surg Res. 2003;114:126
- Laparoscopic ventral hernia repair: A single center experience. Hernia. 2006;1:
- Adhesion formation after intraperitoneal and extraperitoneal implantation of polypropylene mesh. Am Surg. 1998;64:144
- Resistance to adhesion formation: A comparative study of treated and untreated mesh products placed in the abdominal cavity. Hernia. 2004;8:213
- . The argument for lightweight polypropylene mesh in hernia repair. Surg Innov. 2005;12:63
- Mesh implants in hernia repair (Inflammatory cell response in a rat model). Eur Surg Res. 2003;35:161
- The influence of differing pore sizes on the biocompatibility of two polypropylene meshes in the repair of abdominal defects (Experimental study in dogs). Hernia. 2001;5:59
- Relationship between tissue ingrowth and mesh contraction. World J Surg. 2005;29:1038
- Biostability, inflammatory response, and healing characteristics of a fluoropassivated polyester-knit mesh in the repair of experimental abdominal hernias. Artif Organs. 2000;24:533
- Foreign body reaction to meshes used for the repair of abdominal wall hernias. Eur J Surg. 1999;165:665
- . Prosthetic implants for hernia repair. Br J Surg. 2003;90:1457
- . The lightweight and large porous mesh concept for hernia repair. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2005;2:103
- Evaluation of adhesion formation and host tissue response to intra-abdominal polytetrafluoroethylene mesh and composite prosthetic mesh. J Surg Res. 2005;123:227
- Functional impairment and complaints following incisional hernia repair with different polypropylene meshes. Hernia. 2001;5:142
- A lightweight polypropylene mesh (TiMesh) for laparoscopic intraperitoneal repair of abdominal wall hernias: Comparison of biocompatibility with the DualMesh in an experimental study using the porcine model. Surg Endosc. 2006;20:402
- Shrinking of polypropylene mesh in vivo: An experimental study in dogs. Eur J Surg. 1998;164:965–969
PII: S0022-4804(06)00491-4
doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2006.09.015
© 2007 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
« Previous
Next »
Journal of Surgical Research
Volume 140, Issue 1
, Pages 6-11
, 1 June 2007
