« Previous
Next »
Journal of Surgical Research
Volume 140, Issue 1
, Pages 1-5
, 1 June 2007
The Devil Is in the Details: The Pharmaceutical Industry’s Use of Gifts to Physicians as Marketing Strategy
References
- . A social science perspective on gifts to physicians from industry. JAMA. 2003;290:252
- . Doctors and drug companies. N Engl J Med. 2004;351:1885
- . How drug companies operate on the body politic. Business Soc Rev. 1993;58;Winter
- . Psychology in the prescription era. Am Psychol. 2003;1028;December
- . The pharmaceutical industry’s use of gifts and educational events to influence prescription practices: ethical dilemmas and implications for psychologists. Prof Psych Res Pract. 2004;35:329
- Health industry practices that create conflicts of interest. JAMA. 2006;295:429
- . Marketing Management. (12th ed).. Upper Saddle River (NJ): Pearson, Prentice, and Hall; 2006;
- Medical students’ exposure to and attitudes about drug company interactions. JAMA. 2005;294:1034
- . Over half of online physicians participating in e-detailing. Direct Marketing. 2003;November 1
- . Food for thought: why physicians should reconsider gifts from pharmaceutical companies. Curr Surg. 2003;60:152
- . Industry association suspends drug company for entertaining doctors. Br Med J. 2006;332:381
- . National Survey of Physicians, Part 2. Doctors and Prescription Drugs. 2002;March
- . Interactions between physicians and drug company representatives. Am J Med. 1999;107:182
- Attitudes of internal medicine faculty and residents towards professional interaction with pharmaceutical sales representatives. JAMA. 1990;264:1693
- . No more free lunches. Br Med J. 2003;326:1155
- Pharmaceutical industry sponsorship and research outcome. Br Med J. 2003;326:1167
- . A physician survey of the effects of drug sample availability on physicians’ behavior. J Gen Int Med. 1998;7:478
- . Financial conflicts of interest in physicians’ relationships with the pharmaceutical industry—self-regulation in the shadow of federal prosecution. N Engl J Med. 2004;351:1891
- . Are gifts from pharmaceutical companies ethically problematic?. Arch Int Med. 2003;163:2213
- . Teaching appropriate interactions with pharmaceutical company representatives: the impact of an innovative workshop on student attitudes. Med Educ. 2005;5:1
- . Who pays for the pizza? (Redefining the relationships between doctors and drug companies). Br Med J. 2003;326:1193
- . Who’s buying lunch: are gifts to surgeons from industry bad for patients?. Thorac Surg Clin. 2005;15:533
- . How to dance with porcupines: rules and guidelines on doctor’s relations with drug companies. Br Med J. 2003;326:1196
- Pa. hospital bans industry gifts. AMA News. 2006;5:11
- Residents’ perceptions over time of pharmaceutical industry and gifts and the effect of an educational intervention. Acad Med. 2006;81:7
- . Ethical issues in the relationships with industry: an ongoing challenge. J Paediatr Child Health. 2005;41:558
- . Why I no longer accept pens (or other gifts) from industry (and why you shouldn’t either). J. Rheumatol. 2004;31:1478
- . A population-based study on the prevalence and influence of gifts to radiation oncologists from pharmaceutical companies and medical equipment manufacturers. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2004;59:1477
- Resident and faculty perceptions of conflict of interest in medical education. J Gen Int Med. 2005;20:357
- . Doctors and the drug makers. Lancet. 1984;2:276
- . Marketing vital to health care. Advertising Age. 2004;75:28
- . The true colors of physicians. Med Marketing Media. 2004;3:57
- . New federal guidelines for physician-pharmaceutical industry relations: the politics of policy formation. Health Affairs. 2005;24:949
- . Compliance program guidance for pharmaceutical manufacturers. Federal Register. 2003;68:23731
- . Fighting graft—it’s academic. Mod Healthcare. 2006;36:8
PII: S0022-4804(06)00533-6
doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2006.10.010
© 2007 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
« Previous
Next »
Journal of Surgical Research
Volume 140, Issue 1
, Pages 1-5
, 1 June 2007
