Journal of Surgical Research
Volume 141, Issue 1 , Pages 60-67, July 2007

NMR Assessment of Me2SO in Decellularized Cryopreserved Aortic Valve Conduits

  • Eric J. Lehr, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Surgery, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
    • Corresponding Author InformationTo whom correspondence and reprint requests should be addressed at Department of Surgery, University of Alberta Hospital, Dvorkin Lounge, 8440 - 112th Street, Edmonton, AB, Canada T6G 2B7.
  • ,
  • Sarah Hermary, B.S.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Surgery, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
  • ,
  • Ryan T. McKay, Ph.D.

      Affiliations

    • National High Field NMR Centre, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
  • ,
  • Deryck N.H. Webb, B.Sc.

      Affiliations

    • National High Field NMR Centre, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
  • ,
  • Alireza Abazari, B.S.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Chemical and Material Engineering, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
  • ,
  • Locksley E. McGann, Ph.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
  • ,
  • James Y. Coe, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Pediatrics, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
  • ,
  • Gregory S. Korbutt, Ph.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Surgery, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
  • ,
  • David B. Ross, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Surgery, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada

Received 8 January 2007 published online 21 May 2007.

Introduction

Decellularized cryopreserved allograft vascular tissue may provide a nonimmunogenic scaffold that is suitable for repopulation by cells from a variety of sources, conferring the potential for growth and repair. Although dimethyl sulfoxide (Me2SO) is generally regarded as a safe cryoprotectant, even low levels may alter function of repopulating cells. We investigated the residual concentration of Me2SO in the aqueous compartment of cryopreserved ovine aortic valve conduits following decellularization.

Materials and methods

Aortic valve conduits from Suffolk sheep were cryopreserved in 1.1M (7.5% vol/vol) Me2SO according to the protocol of our local tissue bank. Three aortic valve conduits were decellularized in a series of hypotonic and hypertonic Tris buffers. Tissue samples were taken at regular time intervals throughout the decellularization process and equilibrated in double distilled, deionized H2O for 28 days. Quantitative proton nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy was used to determine the residual Me2SO concentration in the equilibration solutions from which Me2SO tissue concentrations were calculated.

Results

After thawing, the mean Me2SO concentration in the valve conduit was 0.302 ± 0.081 M. The decellularization process resulted in a stepwise reduction in the Me2SO concentration to less than 8.56 × 10−5 ± 9 × 10−5 M (P = 0.02). The diffusion coefficient was 2.5 × 10−6 cm2/s.

Conclusions

Our study demonstrates that Me2SO is effectively washed out of the aortic valve conduit during decellularization, resulting in a final concentration that is several orders of magnitude less than Me2SO concentrations reported to alter cell function.

Key Words: aortic valve allograft, tissue engineering, decellularization, cryopreservation, proton NMR, dimethyl sulfoxide, ovine

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0022-4804(07)00243-0

doi:10.1016/j.jss.2007.03.082

Journal of Surgical Research
Volume 141, Issue 1 , Pages 60-67, July 2007