Brief Report: Do Patients With Poor Outcomes Regret Having Had Infrainguinal Bypass Surgery?1
Background
Retrospection and hindsight bias may lead patients with bad outcomes to regret the choice of infrainguinal bypass surgery.
Objective
To assess patients' retrospective evaluations of surgery stratified by common criteria to judge surgical success.
Survey Design
Cross-sectional phone surveys of 33 patients, an average of 162 d following infrainguinal bypass surgery.
Results
Of the 33 patients evaluated, 26 (79%) experienced undesirable outcomes, including amputation (4, 12%), prolonged hospitalization (8, 24%), wound infection (8, 24%), readmission to the hospital (12, 36%), additional surgery (11, 33%), and other complications (16, 48%). Of the patients surveyed, nearly all (30, 91%) reported that they would still want to have had the surgery if they had a 5-y 50% mortality, and the same proportion reported they would recommend the surgery to someone else with similar medical problems (30, 91%).
Conclusions
If confirmed in larger populations, these findings suggest that when viewed retrospectively, results traditionally considered poor outcomes may not deter many patients' preferences for surgical management of their infrainguinal vascular disease.
Key Words: limb salvage, infrainguinal bypass, surgical ethics, hindsight bias
To access this article, please choose from the options below
- 1 This work was presented as a poster at the Society for General Internal Medicine Midwest Regional Meeting, Chicago, IL, September 2005.
PII: S0022-4804(07)00371-X
doi:10.1016/j.jss.2007.05.019
© 2009 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
