Journal of Surgical Research
Volume 171, Issue 1 , Pages 240-244, November 2011

Noninvasive Assessment of Intra-Abdominal Pressure by Measurement of Abdominal Wall Tension1

  • Gabriëlle H. van Ramshorst, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Surgery, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
    • Corresponding Author InformationTo whom correspondence and reprint requests should be addressed at Gabriëlle H. van Ramshorst, Erasmus MC, Department of Surgery, Room Z 836, P.O. Box 2040, 3000 CA Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
  • ,
  • Mahdi Salih

      Affiliations

    • Department of Surgery, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
  • ,
  • Wim C.J. Hop, Ph.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Biostatistics, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
  • ,
  • Oscar J. F. van Waes, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Surgery, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
  • ,
  • Gert-Jan Kleinrensink, Ph.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Neurosciences, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
  • ,
  • Richard H.M. Goossens

      Affiliations

    • Department of Industrial Design, Technical University of Delft, Delft, The Netherlands
    • Department of Neurosciences, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
  • ,
  • Johan F. Lange

      Affiliations

    • Department of Surgery, Rotterdam, The Netherlands

Received 6 October 2009 published online 08 March 2010.

Background

Sustained increased intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) has negative effects. Noninvasive IAP measurement could be beneficial to improve monitoring of patients at risk and in whom IAP measurements might be unreliable. We assessed the relation between IAP and abdominal wall tension (AWT) in vitro and in vivo.

Materials and Methods

The abdomens of 14 corpses were insufflated with air. IAP was measured at intervals up to 20 mm Hg. At each interval, AWT was measured five times at six points. In 42 volunteers, AWT was measured at five points in supine, sitting, and standing positions during various respiratory manoeuvres. Series were repeated in 14 volunteers to measure reproducibility by calculating coefficients of variation (CV). ANOVA was used for analyses.

Results

In corpses, all points showed significant correlations between IAP and AWT (P < 0.001 for points 1–4 in the upper abdomen, P = 0.017 for point 5 and P = 0.008 for point 6 in the lower abdomen). Mean slopes were greatest at points across the epigastric region (points 1–3). In vivo measurements showed that AWT was on average 31% higher in men compared to women (P < 0.001), and increased from expiration to inspiration to Valsalva's manoeuvre (all P < 0.001). AWT was highest at points 1 and 2 and in standing position, followed by supine and sitting positions. BMI did not influence AWT. Mean CV of repeated measurements was 14%.

Conclusions

AWT reflects IAP. The epigastric region appears most suitable for AWT measurements. Further longitudinal clinical studies are needed to assess usefulness of AWT measurements for monitoring of IAP.

Key Words: intra-abdominal pressure, abdominal wall tension, abdominal hypertension, compartment syndrome, measurement, noninvasive, surgery, trauma, complications, bladder pressure

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0022-4804(10)00103-4

doi:10.1016/j.jss.2010.02.007

Journal of Surgical Research
Volume 171, Issue 1 , Pages 240-244, November 2011