Journal of Surgical Research
Volume 166, Issue 2 , Pages e129-e133, April 2011

Continent Catheterizable Umbilical Low-Pressure Intestinal Pouch with Split Ileal End Seromuscular Anti-Reflux Technique

Oncology Center, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt

Received 17 April 2010 published online 01 September 2010.

Background

Cosmesis, better function, and stomal stricture avoidance are important issues in constructing continent urinary abdominal stomas for bladder cancer patients when orthotopic urinary diversion is not feasible. This study aims to evaluate the outcome of continent catheterizable umbilical low-pressure intestinal pouch incorporating a new split ileal end anti-reflux technique.

Methods

Twenty-three patients underwent a continent umbilical low-pressure intestinal pouch incorporating a new seromuscular antireflux technique (split ileal end) after radical cystectomy when orthotopic reconstruction was not feasible. Mean operative time was 210 min (130 min for radical cystectomy and 80 min for reconstruction of the pouch). The mean follow-up after surgery was 18 mo (range 6–30 mo).

Results

The most common early postoperative complications were urinary leak that occurred in nine patients: seven were conservatively managed and two by re-exploration. Late postoperative complications occurred in eight patients, of whom three developed stomal stenosis and treated successfully with repeated dilatation. Thirteen patients were totally continent, seven were fairly continent, and only two were poorly continent.

Conclusions

The functional results with this catheterizable umbilical low pressure intestinal pouch incorporating our new anti-reflux technique were satisfactory with better cosmesis.

Key Words: bladder cancer, bladder reconstruction, continent catheterizable pouch, anti-reflux technique

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0022-4804(10)00680-3

doi:10.1016/j.jss.2010.08.003

Journal of Surgical Research
Volume 166, Issue 2 , Pages e129-e133, April 2011