Journal of Surgical Research
Volume 164, Issue 2 , Pages e229-e233, December 2010

Scoring System for Evaluating Functional Disorders Following Laparoscopy-Assisted Distal Gastrectomy

  • Megumu Enjoji, M.D., Ph.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Esophagogastric Surgery, University Hospital of Medicine, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan
  • ,
  • Hiroyuki Yamada, M.D., Ph.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Surgery, Hokushin General Hospital, Nagano, Japan
    • Corresponding Author InformationTo whom correspondence and reprint requests should be addressed at Department of Surgery, Hokushin General Hospital, 1-5-63 Nishi, Nakano-shi, Nagano 383-8505, Japan.
  • ,
  • Kazuyuki Kojima, M.D., Ph.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Esophagogastric Surgery, University Hospital of Medicine, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan
  • ,
  • Mikito Inokuchi, M.D., Ph.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Esophagogastric Surgery, University Hospital of Medicine, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan
  • ,
  • Keiji Kato, M.D., Ph.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Esophagogastric Surgery, University Hospital of Medicine, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan
  • ,
  • Tatsuyuki Kawano, M.D., Ph.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Esophagogastric Surgery, University Hospital of Medicine, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan
  • ,
  • Kenichi Sugihara, M.D., Ph.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Surgical Oncology, Graduate School, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan

Received 22 February 2010 published online 28 September 2010.

Background

Practical questionnaires for evaluating duodenogastric reflux following gastrectomy are currently unavailable. The present study evaluated the usefulness of the frequency scale for the symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux disease (FSSG) questionnaire in the diagnosis of duodenogastric reflux after laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy (LADG), which minimizes the risk of adhesions affecting the gastrointestinal tract.

Methods

Subjects in this study comprised 163 patients who had undergone LADG (Billroth-I (B-I), n = 57, Roux-en-Y (R-Y), n = 106). All subjects underwent endoscopy at least 6 mo postoperatively. The FSSG questionnaire was administered a few weeks after endoscopy, and FSSG scores were compared with endoscopic findings.

Results

In the R-Y group, FSSG scores were significantly higher in subjects with remnant gastritis than in those without (P = 0.002), and a significant correlation was seen between FSSG scores and bile reflux (P = 0.046). In the B-I group, FSSG scores were significantly higher in subjects with reflux esophagitis than in those without (P = 0.01), but degree of remnant gastritis and residual food did not correlate significantly with FSSG scores. With a cut-off FSSG score of six points, sensitivity and specificity for predicting remnant gastritis in R-Y reconstruction were 71% and 76%, respectively.

Conclusion

The FSSG questionnaire is a viable and less invasive alternative to other modalities for evaluating duodenogastric reflux in R-Y reconstruction, but is unsuitable for B-I reconstruction after LADG.

Key Words: duodenogastric reflux, reflux gastritis, laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy, FSSG questionnaire, Roux-en-Y reconstruction

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0022-4804(10)00708-0

doi:10.1016/j.jss.2010.08.041

Journal of Surgical Research
Volume 164, Issue 2 , Pages e229-e233, December 2010