Introduction: Every year thousands of patients undergoing major surgery experience adverse outcomes
resulting in admission to an intensive care unit (ICU). Optimal management of these
patients in the ICU through evidence based guidelines and processes of care may improve
morbidity and mortality. However, the added value of certified intensivists in guiding
this care remains debatable. Methods: Using 2006 Medicare data, we identified patients undergoing colectomy (n=49,327), pancreatectomy (n=2,748), and esophagectomy (n=2,242) at hospitals participating in the Leapfrog Group Hospital Quality and Safety
Survey. A total of 1,044, 634, and 704 participating hospitals performed colectomy,
pancreatectomy, and esophagectomy, respectively. We compared rates of major complications
(pulmonary failure, pneumonia, myocardial infarction, deep venous thrombosis/pulmonary
embolism, acute renal failure, hemorrhage, surgical site infection, and gastrointestinal
bleeding), failure to rescue (death following a major complication), and 30-day in-hospital
mortality between hospitals reporting adherence to the Leapfrog ICU physician staffing
model and those who did not. Results: For colectomy, pancreatectomy, and esophagectomy, there were 51.9%, 35.6%, and 40.9%,
who underwent surgery in a hospital with certified intensivists, respectively. Hospitals
with the presence of a full-time intensivist had lower mortality rates for all three
operations. Failure to rescue rates were lower in hospitals where an intensivist managed
or co-managed all ICU patients who underwent pancreatectomy (15.7% vs. 26.5%; OR 2.11,
95% CI 1.43-3.12), and colectomy (24.4% vs. 26.1%; OR 1.10, 95% CI 1.01-1.19). For
esophagectomy, there was a trend toward lower failure to rescue rates in hospitals
with dedicated intensivists (19.7% vs. 21.3%; OR 1.04, 95% CI 0.73-1.50). Conclusions: Hospitals with the presence of full-time intensivists who manage or co-manage all
ICU patients are associated with lower mortality and failure to rescue rates after
high risk surgery. Efforts to implement an ICU staffing standard across the United
States should continue to emphasize the potential improvements in patient safety.
To read this article in full you will need to make a payment
Purchase one-time access:
Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online accessOne-time access price info
- For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
- For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'
Subscribe:
Subscribe to Journal of Surgical ResearchAlready a print subscriber? Claim online access
Already an online subscriber? Sign in
Register: Create an account
Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect
Article info
Publication history
36.4
Identification
Copyright
© 2010 Elsevier Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.