Advertisement
Association for Academic Surgery| Volume 180, ISSUE 2, P238-243, April 2013

Prophylactic retention sutures in midline laparotomy in high-risk patients for wound dehiscence: A randomized controlled trial

      Abstract

      Background

      Abdominal wound dehiscence (WD) is a postoperative complication with high mortality and morbidity rates. Retention sutures are often used in surgical take-back for dehiscence. The aim of this study was to assess the reduced rate of dehiscence in midline laparotomy using prophylactic retention sutures in high-risk patients.

      Materials and methods

      Three hundred high-risk patients with at least two risk factors for dehiscence who underwent midline laparotomy between 2008 and 2010 were randomly divided into two groups. In the control group, the fascia was continuously repaired using a running looped #1 nylon suture. For the intervention group, we added retention sutures that included the skin, subcutaneous tissue, rectus muscle, and abdominal fascia. We compared the rates of WD, evisceration, wound infection, postoperative pain, postdehiscence mortality, and late incisional hernia for these two groups.

      Results

      After accounting for early mortalities, 147 patients were followed in the intervention group and 148 patients in the control group. WD occurred in 6 patients (4%) in the intervention group and 20 control patients (13.3%) (P = 0.007). Abdominal evisceration after surgery occurred in 1 patient (0.7%) with retention sutures and 4 control patients (2.7%) (P = 0.371). There was no significant difference in wound infection and incisional hernia between the two groups. Postoperative pain scores between the two groups did not differ significantly during the first 3 d, but did differ on the fourth day.

      Conclusion

      Prophylactic retention sutures reduce the occurrence of WD following midline laparotomy in high-risk patients with multiple risk factors for impaired wound healing without imposing remarkable postoperative complications.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Journal of Surgical Research
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Gislason H.
        • Gronbech J.E.
        • Soreide O.
        Burst abdomen and incisional hernia after major gastrointestinal operations—Comparison of three closure techniques.
        Eur J Surg. 1995; 161: 349
        • Adams G.
        • Richter R.M.
        • Levowitz B.S.
        A safe method of closure with retention sutures.
        Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1973; 136: 981
        • Bucknall T.E.
        • Cox P.J.
        • Ellis H.
        Burst abdomen and incisional hernia: A prospective study of 1129 major laparotomies.
        Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1982; 284: 931
        • Campbell D.P.
        • Swenson O.
        Wound dehiscence in infants and children.
        J Pediatr Surg. 1972; 7: 123
        • Cigdem M.K.
        • Onen A.
        • Otcu S.
        • et al.
        Postoperative abdominal evisceration in children: Possible risk factors.
        Pediatr Surg Int. 2006; 22: 677
        • Penninckx F.M.
        • Poelmans S.V.
        • Kerremans R.P.
        • et al.
        Abdominal wound dehiscence in gastroenterological surgery.
        Ann Surg. 1979; 189: 345
        • Poole Jr., G.V.
        Mechanical factors in abdominal wound closure: The prevention of fascial dehiscence.
        Surgery. 1985; 97: 631
        • Riou J.P.
        • Cohen J.R.
        • Johnson Jr., H.
        Factors influencing wound dehiscence.
        Am J Surg. 1992; 163: 324
        • Waldhausen J.H.
        • Davies L.
        Pediatric postoperative abdominal wound dehiscence: Transverse versus vertical incisions.
        J Am Coll Surg. 2000; 190: 688
        • Wissing J.
        • van Vroonhoven T.J.
        • Schattenkerk M.E.
        • et al.
        Fascia closure after midline laparotomy: Results of a randomized trial.
        Br J Surg. 1987; 74: 738
        • Gruessner R.
        • Pistor G.
        • Kotei D.N.
        Relaparotomie im kindesalter.
        Langenbecks Arch Chir. 1986; 367: 167
        • Armstrong C.P.
        • Dixon J.M.
        • Duffy S.W.
        • et al.
        Wound healing in obstructive jaundice.
        Br J Surg. 1984; 71: 267
        • Col C.
        • Soran A.
        • Col M.
        Can postoperative abdominal wound dehiscence be predicted?.
        Tokai J Exp Clin Med. 1998; 23: 123
        • Halasz N.
        Dehiscence of laparotomy wounds.
        Am J Surg. 1968; 116: 210
        • Humar A.
        • Ramcharan T.
        • Denny R.
        • et al.
        Are wound complications after a kidney transplant more common with modern immunosuppression?.
        Transplantation. 2001; 72: 1920
        • Keill R.H.
        • Keitzer W.F.
        • Nichols W.K.
        • et al.
        Abdominal wound dehiscence.
        Arch Surg. 1973; 106: 573
        • Niggebrugge A.
        • Hansen B.
        • Trimbos J.
        Mechanical factors influencing the incidence of burst abdomen.
        Eur J Surg. 1995; 161: 655
        • Mäkelä J.T.
        • Kiviniemi H.
        • Juvonen T.
        • et al.
        Factors influencing wound dehiscence after midline laparotomy.
        Am J Surg. 1995; 170: 387
        • Pavlidis T.E.
        • Galatianos I.N.
        • Papaziogas B.T.
        • et al.
        Complete dehiscence of the abdominal wound and incriminating factors.
        Eur J Surg. 2001; 167 (discussion 355): 351
        • Swaroop M.
        • Williams M.
        • Greene W.R.
        • et al.
        Multiple laparotomies are a predictor of fascial dehiscence in the setting of severe trauma.
        Am Surg. 2005; 71: 402
        • Wahl W.
        • Menke H.
        • Schnutgen M.
        • et al.
        [Fascia dehiscence—Cause and prognosis].
        Chirurg. 1992; 63: 666
        • Banerjee S.R.
        • Daoud I.
        • Russell J.C.
        • et al.
        Abdominal wound evisceration.
        Curr Surg. 1983; 40: 432
        • Boissel P.
        • Jamart J.
        • Grumillier P.
        • et al.
        A new technique for closing abdominal incisions in patients with poor wound healing.
        Am J Surg. 1982; 143: 380
        • Carlson M.A.
        Acute wound failure.
        Surg Clin North Am. 1997; 77: 607
        • Matsuoka J.
        • Gohchi A.
        • Kamikawa Y.
        • et al.
        Chopstick retention suture for the closure of abdominal wounds.
        J Am Coll Surg. 1995; 181: 471
        • Miles R.M.
        • Moore M.
        • Fitzgerald D.
        • et al.
        The etiology and prevention of abdominal wound disruption: An analysis of 177 cases.
        Am Surg. 1964; 30: 566
        • Ponce L.C.
        • Morgan M.W.
        A safer wire retention suture.
        Am Surg. 1970; 36: 509
        • Stivala O.G.
        Retention suture plates.
        Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1983; 157: 77
        • Webster C.
        • Neumayer L.
        • Smout R.
        • et al.
        Prognostic models of abdominal wound dehiscence after laparotomy.
        J Surg Res. 2003; 109: 130
        • Khan M.
        • Naqvi A.H.
        • Irshad K.
        • et al.
        Frequency and risk factor of abdominal wound dehiscence.
        J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2004; 14: 355
        • Afzal S.
        • Bashir M.M.
        Determinants of wound dehiscence in abdominal surgery in public sector hospital.
        Annals of King Edward Medical University. 2008; 14: 110
        • Sørensen L.T.
        • Hemmingsen U.
        • Kallehave F.
        • et al.
        Risk factors for tissue and wound complications in gastrointestinal surgery.
        Ann Surg. 2005; 241: 654
        • Van Ramshorst G.H.
        • Nieuwenhuizen J.
        • Hop W.C.J.
        • et al.
        Abdominal wound dehiscence in adults: Development and validation of a risk model.
        World J Surg. 2010; 34: 20
        • Rink A.D.
        • Goldschmidt D.
        • Dietrich J.
        • et al.
        Negative side-effects of retention sutures for abdominal wound closure. A prospective randomised study.
        Eur J Surg. 2000; 166: 932
        • MacDougal B.A.
        Locking a continuous running suture.
        J Am Coll Surg. 1995; 181: 563
        • Reitamo J.
        • Moller C.
        Abdominal wound dehiscence.
        Acta Chir Scand. 1972; 138: 170
        • Richards P.C.
        • Balch C.M.
        • Aldrete J.S.
        Abdominal wound closure. A randomized prospective study of 571 patients comparing continuous vs. interrupted suture techniques.
        Ann Surg. 1983; 197: 238
        • Doughty D.B.
        Preventing and managing surgical wound dehiscence.
        Adv Skin Wound Care. 2005; 18: 319
        • Waldrop J.
        • Doughty D.
        Wound healing physiology.
        in: Bryant R. Acute and chronic wounds: Nursing management. 2nd ed. Mosby, St. Louis, MO2000: 17
        • Posthauer M.
        • Thomas D.
        Wound care essentials.
        in: Baranoski S. Ayello E. Nutrition and wound care. Williams and Wilkins, Philadelphia: Lippincott2004: 379
        • Chavez-Cartaya R.
        • Jiron-Vargas A.
        • Pinto S.
        • et al.
        Adjustable nylon ties for abdominal wall closure.
        Am J Surg. 1992; 163: 609
        • Hubbard Jr., T.B.
        • Rever Jr., W.B.
        Retention sutures in the closure of abdominal incisions.
        Am J Surg. 1972; 124: 378
        • Goligher J.C.
        • Irvin T.T.
        • Johnston D.
        • et al.
        A controlled clinical trial of three methods of closure of laparotomy wounds.
        Br J Surg. 1975; 62: 823