Advertisement
Gastrointestinal| Volume 212, P48-53, May 15, 2017

Dissecting malpractice in pancreaticoduodenectomy cases

Published:December 30, 2016DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2016.12.029

      Abstract

      Background

      Medical malpractice is a growing concern for physicians in all fields. Surgical fields have some of the highest malpractice premiums and litigation rates. Pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) has become a popular procedure; however, it is still associated with significant morbidity and mortality. This study is the first to analyze factors involved in litigation regarding PD cases.

      Methods

      The Westlaw database was searched for jury verdicts and settlements using the terms “medical malpractice” and “pancreaticoduodenectomy”. Twenty-nine cases from 1991 to 2012 were initially collected. Seven entries not involving PD and three duplicate cases were excluded. Nineteen cases were included for analysis.

      Results

      Of the 19 cases included in the analysis, three (15.8%) reached a settlement, three (15.8%) were ruled in favor of the plaintiff, and 13 (68.4%) were ruled in favor of the physician. The average settlement award was $398,333 (range, $195,000-500,000), and the average plaintiff award was $4,288,869 (range, $1,066,608-10,300,000). The most common factors raised in litigation included PD being allegedly unnecessary (47.4%), followed by postoperative negligence and misdiagnosis (36.8% each).

      Conclusions

      The most common factors present in litigation included the allegation that PD was unnecessarily performed. The cases that are awarded large monetary sums are those that involve continued medical care. Ways to improve patient safety and limit litigation include increasing transparency and communication with a thorough discussion between surgeon and patient of the most common topics of litigation discussed.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Journal of Surgical Research
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Alkhaffaf B.
        • Decadt B.
        15 years of litigation following laparoscopic cholecystectomy in England.
        Ann Surg. 2010; 251: 682-685
        • Seabury S.A.
        • Chandra A.
        • Lakdawalla D.N.
        • et al.
        On average, physicians spend nearly 11 percent of their 40-year careers with an open, unresolved malpractice claim.
        Health Aff (Millwood). 2013; 32: 111-119
        • Vidmar N.
        Juries and medical malpractice claims: empirical facts versus myths.
        Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009; 467: 367-375
        • DeVille K.
        • Goldberg D.
        • Hassler G.
        Malpractice risk according to physician specialty.
        N Engl J Med. 2011; 365 (author reply 40): 1939
        • Jena A.B.
        • Chandra A.
        • Lakdawalla D.
        • et al.
        Outcomes of medical malpractice litigation against US physicians.
        Arch Intern Med. 2012; 172: 892-894
        • Bendix J.
        Malpractice premiums: for most, the slide continues. Tort reform and a slow economic recovery are bringing rates down, but not everyone is being helped.
        Med Econ. 2012; 89 (52-53): 47-49
        • Whipple A.O.
        • Parsons W.B.
        • Mullins C.R.
        Treatment of carcinoma of the Ampulla of Vater.
        Ann Surg. 1935; 102: 763-779
        • Greenblatt D.Y.
        • Kelly K.J.
        • Rajamanickam V.
        • et al.
        Preoperative factors predict perioperative morbidity and mortality after pancreaticoduodenectomy.
        Ann Surg Oncol. 2011; 18: 2126-2135
        • Lin J.W.
        • Cameron J.L.
        • Yeo C.J.
        • et al.
        Risk factors and outcomes in postpancreaticoduodenectomy pancreaticocutaneous fistula.
        J Gastrointest Surg. 2004; 8: 951-959
        • House M.G.
        • Fong Y.
        • Arnaoutakis D.J.
        • et al.
        Preoperative predictors for complications after pancreaticoduodenectomy: impact of BMI and body fat distribution.
        J Gastrointest Surg. 2008; 12: 270-278
        • Yeo C.J.
        • Cameron J.L.
        • Sohn T.A.
        • et al.
        Six hundred fifty consecutive pancreaticoduodenectomies in the 1990s: pathology, complications, and outcomes.
        Ann Surg. 1997; 226 (discussion 57-60): 248-257
        • Hazelton P.A.
        How much of your print collection is really on Westlaw and Lexis-Nexis.
        Legal Ref Serv Q. 2000; 18: 3-22
        • Svider P.F.
        • Pashkova A.A.
        • Husain Q.
        • et al.
        Determination of legal responsibility in iatrogenic tracheal and laryngeal stenosis.
        Laryngoscope. 2013; 123: 1754-1758
        • Svider P.F.
        • Husain Q.
        • Kovalerchik O.
        • et al.
        Determining legal responsibility in otolaryngology: a review of 44 trials since 2008.
        Am J Otolaryngol. 2013; 34: 699-705
        • Eloy J.A.
        • Svider P.F.
        • Patel D.
        • et al.
        Comparison of plaintiff and defendant expert witness qualification in malpractice litigation in otolaryngology.
        Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2013; 148: 764-769
        • Kovalerchik O.
        • Mady L.J.
        • Svider P.F.
        • et al.
        Physician accountability in iatrogenic cerebrospinal fluid leak litigation.
        Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2013; 3: 722-725
        • Reilly B.K.
        • Horn G.M.
        • Sewell R.K.
        Hearing loss resulting in malpractice litigation: what physicians need to know.
        Laryngoscope. 2013; 123: 112-117
        • Svider P.F.
        • Sunaryo P.L.
        • Keeley B.R.
        • et al.
        Characterizing liability for cranial nerve injuries: a detailed analysis of 209 malpractice trials.
        Laryngoscope. 2013; 123: 1156-1162
        • Svider P.F.
        • Keeley B.R.
        • Zumba O.
        • et al.
        From the operating room to the courtroom: a comprehensive characterization of litigation related to facial plastic surgery procedures.
        Laryngoscope. 2013; 123: 1849-1853
        • Svider P.F.
        • Kovalerchik O.
        • Mauro A.C.
        • et al.
        Legal liability in iatrogenic orbital injury.
        Laryngoscope. 2013; 123: 2099-2103
        • Wegman B.
        • Stannard J.P.
        • Bal B.S.
        Medical liability of the physician in training.
        Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012; 470: 1379-1385
        • Nau M.L.
        • McNiel D.E.
        • Binder R.L.
        Postpartum psychosis and the courts.
        J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 2012; 40: 318-325
        • Lydiatt D.D.
        Medical malpractice and facial nerve paralysis.
        Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2003; 129: 50-53
        • Nash J.J.
        • Nash A.G.
        • Leach M.E.
        • et al.
        Medical malpractice and corticosteroid use.
        Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2011; 144: 10-15
        • Hong S.S.
        • Yheulon C.G.
        • Sniezek J.C.
        Salivary gland surgery and medical malpractice.
        Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2013; 148: 589-594
        • Lekovic G.P.
        • Harrington T.R.
        Litigation of missed cervical spine injuries in patients presenting with blunt traumatic injury.
        Neurosurgery. 2007; 60 (discussion 22-23): 516-522
        • Frank-Stromborg M.
        • Ganschow J.R.
        Legal issues in the early detection and monitoring of cancer.
        Semin Oncol Nurs. 2002; 18: 128-134
        • Mitnick J.S.
        • Vazquez M.F.
        • Kronovet S.Z.
        • et al.
        Malpractice litigation involving patients with carcinoma of the breast.
        J Am Coll Surg. 1995; 181: 315-321
        • Morris L.G.
        • Ziff D.J.
        • Delacure M.D.
        Malpractice litigation after surgical injury of the spinal accessory nerve: an evidence-based analysis.
        Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2008; 134: 102-107
        • Blaivas M.
        • Pawl R.
        Analysis of lawsuits filed against emergency physicians for point-of-care emergency ultrasound examination performance and interpretation over a 20-year period.
        Am J Emerg Med. 2012; 30: 338-341
        • Shah O.J.
        • Gagloo M.A.
        • Khan I.J.
        • et al.
        Pancreaticoduodenectomy: a comparison of superior approach with classical Whipple's technique.
        Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int. 2013; 12: 196-203
        • Studdert D.M.
        • Mello M.M.
        • Brennan T.A.
        Medical malpractice.
        N Engl J Med. 2004; 350: 283-292
        • Leape L.L.
        • Brennan T.A.
        • Laird N.
        • et al.
        The nature of adverse events in hospitalized patients. Results of the Harvard Medical Practice Study II.
        N Engl J Med. 1991; 324: 377-384
        • Garcea G.
        • Metcalfe M.S.
        • Berry D.P.
        • et al.
        Is intraoperative confirmation of malignancy during pancreaticoduodenectomy mandatory?.
        J Gastrointest Surg. 2012; 16: 370-375
        • Tsai P.J.
        • Wang S.E.
        • Shyr Y.M.
        • et al.
        Diagnostic and therapeutic dilemmas in periampullary lesions.
        Hepatogastroenterology. 2012; 59: 1621-1625
        • Brennan T.A.
        • Sox C.M.
        • Burstin H.R.
        Relation between negligent adverse events and the outcomes of medical-malpractice litigation.
        N Engl J Med. 1996; 335: 1963-1967
        • Svider P.F.
        • Blake D.M.
        • Husain Q.
        • et al.
        In the eyes of the law: malpractice litigation in oculoplastic surgery.
        Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013; 30: 119-123
        • Svider P.F.
        • Pashkova A.A.
        • Vidal G.P.
        • et al.
        Esophageal perforation and rupture: a comprehensive medicolegal examination of 59 jury verdicts and settlements.
        J Gastrointest Surg. 2013; 17: 1732-1738
        • Choudhry A.J.
        • Anandalwar S.P.
        • Choudry A.J.
        • et al.
        Uncovering malpractice in appendectomies: a review of 234 Cases.
        J Gastrointest Surg. 2013; 17: 1796-1803
        • Paik A.M.
        • Mady L.J.
        • Sood A.
        • et al.
        A look inside the courtroom: an analysis of 292 cosmetic breast surgery medical malpractice cases.
        Aesthet Surg J. 2013; 34: 79-86
        • Levinson W.
        • Roter D.L.
        • Mulloly J.P.
        • et al.
        Physician-patient communication. The relationship with malpractice claims among primary care physicians and surgeons.
        JAMA. 1997; 277: 553-559
        • Ambady N.
        • Laplante D.
        • Nguyen T.
        • et al.
        Surgeons' tone of voice: a clue to malpractice history.
        Surgery. 2002; 132: 5-9