Advertisement
Healthcare Delivery, Quality, and Safety| Volume 232, P332-337, December 2018

The Transition to Data-Driven Quality Metrics: Determining the Optimal Surveillance Period for Complications After Surgery

      Abstract

      Background

      Thirty-day complications frequently serve in the surgical literature as a quality indicator. This metric is not meant to capture the full array of complication resulting from surgical intervention. However, this period is largely based on convention, with little evidence to support it. This study sought to determine the optimal surveillance period for postsurgical complications, defined as the shortest period that also encompassed the highest proportion of postsurgical adverse events.

      Methods

      TRICARE data (2006-2014) were queried for adult (18-64 y) patients who underwent one of 11 surgical procedures. Patients were assessed for complications up to 90 d after surgery. Kaplan–Meier curves, linear spline regression models at each incremental postsurgical day, and adjusted R-squared values were used to identify critical time point cutoffs for the surveillance of complications. Optimal length of surveillance was defined as the postsurgical day on which the model demonstrated the highest R-squared value. A supplemental analysis considered these measures for orthopedic and general surgical procedures.

      Results

      One lakh ninety-eight patients met the inclusion criteria. A total of 21.8% patients experienced at least one complication during the follow-up period, with 59% occurring within the first 15 d. Kaplan–Meier curves for complications showed a demonstrable inflection before 20 d and 14-15 d possessed the highest R-squared values.

      Conclusions

      In this analysis, the optimal surveillance period for postsurgical complications was 15 d. While the conventional 30-d period may still be appropriate for a variety of reasons, the shorter interval identified here may represent a superior quality measure specific to surgical practice.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Journal of Surgical Research
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Møller C.H.
        • Perko M.J.
        • Lund J.T.
        • et al.
        No major differences in 30-day outcomes in high-risk patients randomized to off-pump versus on-pump coronary bypass surgery.
        Circulation. 2010; 121: 498-504
        • Ingraham A.M.
        • Cohen M.E.
        • Bilimoria K.Y.
        • et al.
        Comparison of 30-day outcomes after emergency general surgery procedures: potential for targeted improvement.
        Surgery. 2010; 148: 217-238
        • Ingraham A.M.
        • Cohen M.E.
        • Raval M.V.
        • Ko C.Y.
        • Nathens A.B.
        Effect of trauma center status on 30-day outcomes after emergency general surgery.
        J Am Coll Surg. 2011; 212: 277-286
        • Cima R.R.
        • Lackore K.A.
        • Nehring S.A.
        • et al.
        How best to measure surgical quality? Comparison of the agency for healthcare research and quality patient safety indicators (AHRQ-PSI) and the American college of surgeons national surgical quality improvement program (ACS-NSQIP) postoperative adverse events at a single institution.
        Surgery. 2011; 150: 943-949
        • Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services
        Quality measures.
        (Available at:)
        • Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services
        Medicare program; hospital inpatient value-based purchasing program. Final rule.
        Fed Regist. 2011; 76: 26490
      1. TRICARE. Facts and figures.
        (Available at:)
        https://www.tricare.mil/About/Facts
        Date accessed: January 8, 2017
        • Chaudhary M.A.
        • Schoenfeld A.J.
        • Harlow A.F.
        • et al.
        Incidence and predictors of opioid prescription at discharge after traumatic injury.
        JAMA Surg. 2018; 152: 930-936
        • Chaudhary M.A.
        • Leow J.J.
        • Mossanen M.
        • et al.
        Patient driven care in the management of prostate cancer: analysis of the United States military healthcare system.
        BMC Urol. 2017; 17: 56
        • Schoenfeld A.J.
        • Jiang W.
        • Harris M.B.
        • et al.
        Association between race and postoperative outcomes in a universally insured population versus patients in the state of California.
        Ann Surg. 2017; 266: 267-273
        • Zogg C.K.
        • Jiang W.
        • Chaudhary M.A.
        • et al.
        Racial disparities in emergency general surgery: do differences in outcomes persist among universally insured military patients?.
        J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2016; 80: 764-777
        • Schoenfeld A.J.
        • Kaji A.H.
        • Haider A.H.
        Practical guide to surgical data sets: military health system TRICARE encounter data.
        JAMA Surg. 2018; (E-pub ahead of print)
        • Deyo R.A.
        • Cherkin D.C.
        • Ciol M.A.
        Adapting a clinical comorbidity index for use with ICD-9-CM administrative databases.
        J Clin Epidemiol. 1992; 45: 613-619
        • Chaudhary M.A.
        • Shah A.A.
        • Zogg C.K.
        • et al.
        Differences in rural and urban outcomes: a national inspection of emergency general surgery patients.
        J Surg Res. 2017; 218: 277-284
        • Keith S.W.
        • Allison D.B.
        A free-knot spline modeling framework for piecewise linear logistic regression in complex samples with body mass index and mortality as an example.
        Front Nutr. 2014; 2014: 00016
        • Chowdhury R.
        • Davis W.A.
        • Chaudhary M.A.
        • et al.
        Race-based differences in duration of stay among universally insured coronary artery bypass graft patients in military versus civilian hospitals.
        Surgery. 2017; 161: 1090-1099
        • Jencks S.F.
        • Williams D.K.
        • Kay T.L.
        Assessing hospital-associated deaths from discharge data: the role of length of stay and comorbidities.
        JAMA. 1988; 260: 2240-2246
        • Encinosa W.E.
        • Bernard D.M.
        • Chen C.-C.
        • Steiner C.A.
        Healthcare utilization and outcomes after bariatric surgery.
        Med Care. 2006; 44: 706-712
        • Bilimoria K.Y.
        • Cohen M.E.
        • Ingraham A.M.
        • et al.
        Effect of postdischarge morbidity and mortality on comparisons of hospital surgical quality.
        Ann Surg. 2010; 252: 183-190
        • Lawson E.H.
        • Louie R.
        • Zingmond D.S.
        • et al.
        A comparison of clinical registry versus administrative claims data for reporting of 30-day surgical complications.
        Ann Surg. 2012; 256: 973-981