Reoperative Cervical Endocrine Surgery: Appropriate Valuation for the Time and Effort?

Published:February 27, 2021DOI:



      Controversies currently exist regarding the best way to appropriately quantify complexity and to benchmark reimbursement for surgeons. This study aims to analyze surgeon reimbursement in primary and redo-thyroidectomy and parathyroidectomy using operative time as a surrogate for complexity.


      A retrospective analysis using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database was performed to identify patients who underwent primary and redo-thyroidectomy and parathyroidectomy. Calculations of median operative time work relative value units per minute and dollars per minute were compared between primary and redo procedures.


      Thyroidectomy cases represented 53.5% (22,521 cases), and the other 46.5% (19,596 cases) were parathyroidectomy cases. The median dollars per minute in primary thyroidectomy was $4.97 and for redo-thyroidectomy was $8.12 (P < 0.0001). By the same token, dollars per minute were higher in the redo cases with $15.40 when compared with primary parathyroidectomy cases with $13.14 dollars per minute (P < 0.0001).


      By Current Procedural Terminology codes, surgeons appear to be appropriately reimbursed for redo-thyroid and parathyroid procedures indexed to first time parathyroidectomy based on the compensated operative time of these procedures calculated using a nationally representative sample.


      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'


      Subscribe to Journal of Surgical Research
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect


        • Maxwell S.
        • Zuckerman S.
        Impact of resource-based practice expenses on the medicare physician volume.
        Health Care Financ Rev. 2007; 29: 65-79
        • Childers C.P.
        • Dworsky J.Q.
        • Russell M.M.
        • Maggard-Gibbons M.
        Association of work measures and specialty with assigned work relative value units among surgeons.
        JAMA Surg. 2019; 154: 915-921
        • Orr R.D.
        • Sodhi N.
        • Dalton S.E.
        • et al.
        What provides a better value for your time? The use of relative value units to compare posterior segmental instrumentation of vertebral segments.
        Spine J. 2018; 18: 1727-1732
        • Chan D.C.
        • Huynh J.
        • Studdert D.M.
        Accuracy of valuations of surgical procedures in the medicare fee schedule.
        N Engl J Med. 2019; 380: 1546-1554
        • Sodhi N.
        • Piuzzi N.S.
        • Khlopas A.
        • et al.
        Are we appropriately compensated by relative value units for primary vs revision total hip arthroplasty?.
        J Arthroplasty. 2018; 33: 340-344
        • Samuel L.T.
        • Grits D.
        • Acuña A.J.
        • Piuzzi N.S.
        • Higuera-Rueda C.A.
        • Kamath A.F.
        Work relative value units do not adequately support the burden of infection management in revision knee arthroplasty.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2020; 102: 230-236
        • Martin J.D.
        • Warble P.B.
        • Hupp J.A.
        • et al.
        A real world analysis of payment per unit time in a Maryland Vascular Practice.
        J Vasc Surg. 2010; 52: 1094-1098
        • Proczko M.
        • Stefaniak T.
        • Sworczak K.
        • et al.
        Completion thyroidectomy of well-differentiated thyroid cancer - a prospective, miserandomised study.
        Endokrynol Pol. 2013; 64: 335-339
        • Khan M.
        • Ali Syed A.
        • Khan A.I.
        • Raza Hussain S.
        • Zafar W.
        Morbidity comparison of Primary and Completion Total thyroidectomy for differentiated thyroid cancer in relation to the extent of Redo surgery.
        Int J Surg Open. 2015; 1: 14-17
        • American College of Surgeons
        American College of surgeons-national surgical quality improvement Program.
        (Available at:)
        • Fuchshuber P.R.
        • Greif W.
        • Tidwell C.R.
        • et al.
        The power of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program--achieving a zero pneumonia rate in general surgery patients.
        Perm J. 2012; 16: 39-45
        • Lee P.
        • Chin K.
        • Liew D.
        • et al.
        Economic evaluation of clinical quality registries: a systematic review.
        BMJ Open. 2019; 9: 1-10
        • Thanh N.X.
        • Baron T.
        • Litvinchuk S.
        An economic evaluation of the national surgical quality improvement Program (NSQIP) in alberta, Canada.
        Ann Surg. 2019; 269: 866-872
        • Seidenwurm D.J.
        • Burleson J.H.
        The medicare conversion factor.
        Am J Neuroradiol. 2014; 35: 242-243
        • Chakedis J.M.
        • Maser C.
        • Brumund K.T.
        • Bouvet M.
        Indocyanine green fluorescence-guided redo parathyroidectomy.
        BMJ Case Rep. 2015; 2015: 1-3
        • Abboud B.
        • Sleilaty G.
        • Eid T.
        Morbidity of redo surgery for thyroid disease.
        Acta Chir Belg. 2014; 114: 381-387
        • Doval A.F.
        • Nguyen-Lee J.J.
        • Beal L.L.
        • Zheng F.
        • Echo A.
        Does complexity relate to compensation? A comparison of relative value units in initial versus recurrent inguinal hernia repair.
        Hernia. 2019; 24: 245-250
        • Little D.C.
        • Peter SD St.
        • Calkins C.M.
        • et al.
        Relative value units correlate with pediatric surgeons’ operating time: when perceived myth becomes reality.
        J Pediatr Surg. 2006; 41: 234-238
        • Chan D.C.
        • Huynh J.
        • Studdert D.M.
        Accuracy of valuations of surgical procedures in the medicare fee schedule.
        N Engl J Med. 2019; 380: 1546-1554
        • Chakiryan N.H.
        • Jiang D.D.
        • Gillis K.A.
        • Chen Y.
        • Martinez Acevedo A.
        • Sajadi K.P.
        Relative value units do not adequately account for operative time in urologic surgery.
        J Urol. 2019; 203: 1003-1007
        • Shah D.R.
        • Bold R.J.
        • Yang A.D.
        • Khatri V.P.
        • Martinez S.R.
        • Canter R.J.
        Relative value units poorly correlate with measures of surgical effort and complexity.
        J Surg Res. 2014; 190: 465-470