Advertisement
Research Article| Volume 272, P69-78, April 2022

Download started.

Ok

Outcomes of Heart Transplant Recipients with Class II Obesity: A United Network for Organ Sharing Database Analysis

Published:December 19, 2021DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2021.11.005

      Highlights

      • The 2016 ISHLT listing criteria for heart transplantation recommended that recipients have a BMI <35 kg/ m², putting obese individuals who need cardiac transplantation at a disadvantage.
      • Recipients with a BMI of 35 to 39.9 kg/ m² have better outcomes than do those with a BMI ≥40 kg/m2 and should be considered as a distinct group.
      • Selected individuals with a BMI of 35 to 39.9 kg/m2 should be considered as candidates for heart transplantation.
      • Improved quality of life and survival from a heart transplantation outweigh the risks associated with a BMI of 35 to 39.9 kg/m2.

      ABSTRACT

      Background

      In the 2016 ISHLT listing criteria guidelines for heart transplantation, recipients were recommended to have a body mass index (BMI) <35 kg/m². However, outcomes data for subgroups of transplant recipients with a BMI >35 kg/m² are limited. We examined the outcomes of heart transplant recipients who had a BMI of 35 to 39.9 kg/m² or ≥40 kg/m² and compared their outcomes with recipients who had a BMI <35 kg/m2.

      Methods

      Using data from the United Network for Organ Sharing database, we performed a retrospective cohort analysis of 23,009 adults who underwent cardiac transplantation between 2009 and 2018. Transplant recipients were stratified by BMI categories (<35 kg/m², 35-39.9 kg/m², and ≥40 kg/m²). Patient survival was depicted by Kaplan-Meier curves. Cox proportional-hazards modeling was used to determine the prognostic factors associated with mortality within 90 days, 1 year, and 5 years after transplantation.

      Results

      Survival at 90 days, 1 year, and 5 years after transplantation was better in recipients who had a BMI <35 kg/m² than in those who had a BMI of 35 to 39.9 kg/m² (P values ranged from 0.01 to < 0.001) or ≥40 kg/m² (P < 0.001). Additionally, survival at 90 days (P < 0.001) and 1 year (P = 0.002) was significantly better in recipients who had a BMI of 35 to 39.9 kg/m² than in those who had a BMI ≥40 kg/m². In multivariate analysis, a BMI of 35 to 39.9 was significantly associated with increased 90-day mortality (HR = 1.53; 95% CI 1.12, 2.08; P = 0.01) but not increased 1-year (HR = 1.28; 95% CI 0.99, 1.66; P = 0.06) or 5-year mortality (HR = 1.11; 95% CI 0.91, 1.36; P = 0.29).

      Conclusions

      Although heart transplant recipients with class II obesity (BMI 35-39.9 kg/m²) may have suboptimal survival compared with those who have a BMI <35 kg/m², these patients have better outcomes than do those with class III obesity (BMI ≥40 kg/m²). Thus, contrary to current guidelines, selected patients with class II obesity should be considered for transplantation.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Journal of Surgical Research
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Nagendran J
        • Moore MD
        • Norris CM
        • et al.
        The varying effects of obesity and morbid obesity on outcomes following cardiac transplantation.
        Int J Obes (Lond). 2016; 40: 721-724https://doi.org/10.1038/ijo.2016.20
        • Weber DJ
        • Hashmi ZA
        • Gracon AS
        • et al.
        Recipient body mass index and age interact to impact survival after heart transplantation.
        Clin Transplant. 2014; 28: 1279-1286https://doi.org/10.1111/ctr.12460
        • Foroutan F
        • Doumouras BS
        • Ross H
        • et al.
        Impact of pretransplant recipient body mass index on post heart transplant mortality: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
        Clin Transplant. 2018; 32: e13348https://doi.org/10.1111/ctr.13348
        • Mehra MR
        • Canter CE
        • Hannan MM
        • et al.
        The 2016 International Society for Heart Lung Transplantation listing criteria for heart transplantation: A 10-year update.
        J Heart Lung Transplant. 2016; 35: 1-23https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healun.2015.10.023
      1. Clinical guidelines on the identification, evaluation, and treatment of overweight and obesity in adults: executive summary. Expert Panel on the Identification, Evaluation, and Treatment of Overweight in Adults.
        Am J Clin Nutr. 1998; 68: 899-917https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/68.4.899
        • Russo MJ
        • Hong KN
        • Davies RR
        • et al.
        The effect of body mass index on survival following heart transplantation: do outcomes support consensus guidelines?.
        Ann Surg. 2010; 251: 144-152https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181b5db3c
        • Montenovo MI
        • Hansen RN
        • Dick AAS
        • et al.
        Donor age still matters in liver transplant: Results from the United Network for Organ Sharing-scientific registry of transplant recipients database.
        Exp Clin Transplant. 2017; 15: 536-541https://doi.org/10.6002/ect.2016.0011
      2. World Health Organization. Body mass index - BMI. Available at: https://www.euro.who.int/en/health-topics/disease-prevention/nutrition/a-healthy-lifestyle/body-mass-index-bmi. Accessed September 12.

      3. Stata Base Reference Manual, Release 16. Stata Press. Available at: https://www.stata.com/manuals/r.pdf. Accessed September 12.

      4. Hastie T, Tibshirani R, Wainwright M. Statistical learning with sparsity: The lasso and generalizations. Available at: https://web.stanford.edu/~hastie/StatLearnSparsity_files/SLS_corrected_1.4.16.pdf. Accessed September 12.

        • Clerkin KJ
        • Naka Y
        • Mancini DM
        • et al.
        The impact of obesity on patients bridged to transplantation with continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices.
        JACC Heart Fail. 2016; 4: 761-768https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jchf.2016.05.010
        • Teuteberg JJ
        • Cleveland Jr., JC
        • Cowger J
        • et al.
        The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Intermacs 2019 Annual Report: The changing landscape of devices and indications.
        Ann Thorac Surg. 2020; 109: 649-660https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2019.12.005
        • Khaodhiar L
        • McCowen KC
        • Blackburn GL.
        Obesity and its comorbid conditions.
        Clin Cornerstone. 1999; 2: 17-31https://doi.org/10.1016/s1098-3597(99)90002-9
        • Angerås O
        • Albertsson P
        • Karason K
        • et al.
        Evidence for obesity paradox in patients with acute coronary syndromes: a report from the Swedish Coronary Angiography and Angioplasty Registry.
        Eur Heart J. 2012; 34: 345-353https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehs217
        • Jawitz OK
        • Raman V
        • Klapper J
        • et al.
        Donor and recipient age matching in heart transplantation: analysis of the UNOS Registry.
        Transpl Int. 2019; 32: 1194-1202https://doi.org/10.1111/tri.13481
        • Oreopoulos A
        • Padwal R
        • Kalantar-Zadeh K
        • et al.
        Body mass index and mortality in heart failure: A meta-analysis.
        Am Heart J. 2008; 156: 13-22https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ahj.2008.02.014
        • Mariscalco G
        • Wozniak MJ
        • Dawson AG
        • et al.
        Body mass index and mortality among adults undergoing cardiac surgery.
        Circulation. 2017; 135: 850-863https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.116.022840
        • Burgos LM
        • Gil Ramírez A
        • Seoane L
        • et al.
        Is the obesity paradox in cardiac surgery really a myth? Effect of body mass index on early and late clinical outcomes.
        J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2021; 35: 492-498https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jvca.2020.03.051
        • Samuels JD
        • Lui B
        • White RS.
        Clearing up the obesity paradox in cardiac surgery.
        J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2021; 35: 959-960https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jvca.2020.06.057
        • Doumouras BS
        • Fan CS
        • Mueller B
        • et al.
        The effect of pre-heart transplant body mass index on posttransplant outcomes: An analysis of the ISHLT Registry Data.
        Clin Transplant. 2019; 33: e13621https://doi.org/10.1111/ctr.13621
        • Ayloo S
        • Hurton S
        • Cwinn M
        • et al.
        Impact of body mass index on outcomes of 48281 patients undergoing first time cadaveric liver transplantation.
        World J Transplant. 2016; 6: 356-369https://doi.org/10.5500/wjt.v6.i2.356
        • Milaniak I
        • Przybylowski P
        • Wierzbicki K
        • et al.
        Post-transplantation body mass index in heart transplant recipients: determinants and consequences.
        Transplant Proc. 2014; 46: 2844-2847https://doi.org/10.1016/j.transproceed.2014.09.025
      5. World Health Organization. Obesity: Preventing and managing the gloval epidemic. In 2000. Pp. 252.