Advertisement

Associations Between Care Bundles and Postoperative Outcomes After Major Emergency Abdominal Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Published:November 24, 2022DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2022.10.064

      Abstract

      Introduction

      Care bundles were found to improve postoperative outcomes in elective surgery. However, in major emergency general surgery studies show a divergent impact on mortality and length of stay. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate associations between care bundles and mortality, complications, and length of stay when applied in major emergency general surgery.

      Methods

      A systematic literature search in PubMed and Embase was performed on the May 1, 2021. Only comparative studies on care bundles in major emergency general surgery were included. Meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis were performed on 30-d mortality. We undertook a narrative approach of long-term mortality, complications, and length of stay.

      Results

      Meta-analysis of 13 studies with 35,771 patients demonstrated that care bundles in emergency surgery were not associated with a significant reduction in odds of 30-d mortality (odds ratio = 0.8, 95% confidence interval 0.62-1.03). Trial sequential analysis confirmed that the meta-analysis was underpowered with a minimum of 78,901 patients required for firm conclusions. Seven studies reported complication rates whereof six reported lower complication rates using care bundles.

      Conclusions

      Care bundles were reported to decrease postoperative complications in five out of seven studies and seven out of 11 studies reported a shortening in length of stay.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Journal of Surgical Research
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Huddart S.
        • Peden C.
        • Quiney N.
        Emergency major abdominal surgery--‘the times they are a-changing’.
        Colorectal Dis. 2013; 15: 645-649
        • Barrow E.
        • Anderson I.D.
        • Varley S.
        • et al.
        Current UK practice in emergency laparotomy.
        Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2013; 95: 599-603
        • Green G.
        • Shaikh I.
        • Fernandes R.
        • Wegstapel H.
        Emergency laparotomy in octogenarians: a 5-year study of morbidity and mortality.
        World J Gastrointest Surg. 2013; 5: 216-221
        • Svenningsen P.
        • Manoharan T.
        • Foss N.B.
        • Lauritsen M.L.
        • Bay-Nielsen M.
        Increased mortality in the elderly after emergency abdominal surgery.
        Danish Med J. 2014; 61: A4876
        • Tengberg L.T.
        • Cihoric M.
        • Foss N.B.
        • et al.
        Complications after emergency laparotomy beyond the immediate postoperative period - a retrospective, observational cohort study of 1139 patients.
        Anaesthesia. 2017; 72: 309-316
        • Resar R.
        • Griffin F.
        • Haraden C.
        • Nolan T.
        Using Care Bundles to Improve Health Care Quality.
        Institute for Healthcare Improvement, Cambridge, Massachusetts2012
        • Currie A.
        • Burch J.
        • Jenkins J.T.
        • et al.
        The impact of enhanced recovery protocol compliance on elective colorectal cancer resection: results from an international registry.
        Ann Surg. 2015; 261: 1153-1159
        • Lavallée J.F.
        • Gray T.A.
        • Dumville J.
        • Russell W.
        • Cullum N.
        The effects of care bundles on patient outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
        Implement Sci. 2017; 12: 142
        • Huddart S.
        • Peden C.J.
        • Swart M.
        • et al.
        Use of a pathway quality improvement care bundle to reduce mortality after emergency laparotomy.
        Br J Surg. 2015; 102: 57-66
        • Tengberg L.T.
        • Bay-Nielsen M.
        • Bisgaard T.
        • et al.
        Multidisciplinary perioperative protocol in patients undergoing acute high-risk abdominal surgery.
        Br J Surg. 2017; 104: 463-471
        • Peden C.J.
        • Stephens T.
        • Martin G.
        • et al.
        A national quality improvement programme to improve survival after emergency abdominal surgery: the EPOCH stepped-wedge cluster RCT.
        Health Serv Deliv Res. 2019; 7: 1-96
        • Page M.J.
        • McKenzie J.E.
        • Bossuyt P.M.
        • et al.
        The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews.
        The BMJ. 2021; 372: n71
        • Veritas Health Innovation
        Covidence systematic review software.
        (Available at:)
        www.covidence.org
        Date accessed: July 1, 2021
        • Wan X.
        • Wang W.
        • Liu J.
        • Tong T.
        Estimating the sample mean and standard deviation from the sample size, median, range and/or interquartile range.
        BMC Med Res Methodol. 2014; 14: 135
        • The Cochrane Collaboration
        Review manager 5.
        (Available at:)
        www.cochrane.org
        Date accessed: May 1, 2021
        • Wetterslev J.
        • Thorlund K.
        • Brok J.
        • Gluud C.
        Trial sequential analysis may establish when firm evidence is reached in cumulative meta-analysis.
        J Clin Epidemiol. 2008; 61: 64-75
        • Peden C.J.
        • Stephens T.
        • Martin G.
        • et al.
        Effectiveness of a national quality improvement programme to improve survival after emergency abdominal surgery (EPOCH): a stepped-wedge cluster-randomised trial.
        Lancet. 2019; 6736: 1-10
        • Aggarwal G.
        • Peden C.J.
        • Mohammed M.A.
        • et al.
        Evaluation of the collaborative use of an evidence-based care bundle in emergency laparotomy.
        JAMA Surg. 2019; 154: e190145
        • Jordan L.C.
        • Cook T.M.
        • Cook S.C.
        • et al.
        Sustaining better care for patients undergoing emergency laparotomy.
        Anaesthesia. 2020; 75: 1321-1330
      1. McMaster University and Evidence Prime. GRADEpro GDT: GRADEpro guideline Development Tool. P

        • Sterne J.A.
        • Hernán M.A.
        • Reeves B.C.
        • et al.
        ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions.
        BMJ. 2016; 355: i4919
        • Higgins J.P.T.
        • Altman D.G.
        • Gøtzsche P.C.
        • Jüni P.
        The Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials.
        BMJ. 2021; 343: d5928
        • Saurabh K.
        • Sureshkumar S.
        • Mohsina S.
        • Mahalakshmy T.
        • Kundra P.
        • Kate V.
        Adapted ERAS pathway versus standard care in patients undergoing emergency small bowel surgery: a randomized controlled trial.
        J Gastrointest Surg. 2020; 24: 2077-2087
        • Viñas X.
        • Macarulla E.
        • Brugiotti C.
        • et al.
        Feasibility and effects of enhanced recovery vs. conventional care after emergency colon surgery for patients with left colon perforation.
        Sci Rep. 2020; 10: 7346
        • Shang Y.
        • Guo C.
        • Zhang D.
        Modified enhanced recovery after surgery protocols are beneficial for postoperative recovery for patients undergoing emergency surgery for obstructive colorectal cancer: a propensity score matching analysis.
        Medicine. 2018; 97: e12348
        • Mohsina S.
        • Shanmugam D.
        • Sureshkumar S.
        • Kundra P.
        • Mahalakshmy T.
        • Kate V.
        Adapted ERAS pathway vs. standard care in patients with perforated duodenal ulcer - a randomized controlled trial.
        J Gastrointest Surg. 2017; 22: 107-116
        • Lohsiriwat V.
        Enhanced recovery after surgery vs conventional care in emergency colorectal surgery.
        World J Gastroenterol. 2014; 20: 13950-13955
        • Martínez-Serrano M.A.
        • Pereira J.A.
        • Sancho J.
        • Argudo N.
        • López-Cano M.
        • Grande L.
        Specific improvement measures to reduce complications and mortality after urgent surgery in complicated abdominal wall hernia.
        Hernia. 2012; 16: 171-177
        • Møller M.H.
        • Vester-Andersen M.
        • Thomsen R.W.
        Long-term mortality following peptic ulcer perforation in the PULP trial. A nationwide follow-up study.
        Scand J Gastroenterol. 2012; 48: 168-175
        • Møller M.H.
        • Adamsen S.
        • Thomsen R.W.
        • Møller A.M.
        Multicentre trial of a perioperative protocol to reduce mortality in patients with peptic ulcer perforation.
        Br J Surg. 2011; 98: 802-810
        • Hajibandeh S.
        • Hajibandeh S.
        • Bill V.
        • Satyadas T.
        Meta-analysis of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols in emergency abdominal surgery.
        World J Surg. 2020; 44: 1336-1348
        • Shida D.
        • Tagawa K.
        • Inada K.
        • et al.
        Modified enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols for patients with obstructive colorectal cancer.
        BMC Surg. 2017; 17: 18
        • Wisely J.C.
        • Barclay K.L.
        Effects of an Enhanced Recovery after Surgery programme on emergency surgical patients.
        ANZ J Surg. 2016; 86: 883-888
        • Gonenc M.
        • Dural A.C.
        • Celik F.
        • et al.
        Enhanced postoperative recovery pathways in emergency surgery: a randomised controlled clinical trial.
        Am J Surg. 2014; 207: 807-814